This is a serious ask. Read first.
A fellowship is not a job. It is not a residency. It is a standing invitation to do the work you would do anyway — within a peer group whose standards are higher than yours, and under a compact whose terms are the same for everyone.
You should probably not apply if —
You are looking primarily for compensation, and the 60/40 compact strikes you as unfair before you have read the reasoning behind it.
You want a title, a résumé line, or institutional cover — and the work itself is secondary.
You need an employer. We are not one. Fellows remain independent; we hold no W-2, grant no salary.
You cannot bring yourself to write five paragraphs about a problem you have been thinking about for years. The application is mostly writing.
None of this is a boast. We have rejected applications from credentialed researchers at prestigious institutions and admitted fellows without PhDs. The filter is not pedigree; it is fit.
Four questions. Write as if for the fellow who will read them.
Nothing is rushed. Nothing is performative.
- 01Read
Three current Fellows independently read and score your submission.
- 02Discuss
The cohort discusses shortlisted applications in open session.
- 03Converse
One long, unhurried conversation. Not an interview — a working discussion.
- 04Decide
The cohort votes. Admission is by consensus, not majority.
We do not publish admission statistics. We admit a small number of fellows a year, across all labs combined, and we admit none rather than stretch the standard.